<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Capitalist Maven</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com</link>
	<description>Money, finance, deals, etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Motion Detection For Hotel A/C by Alexis</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=144&#038;cpage=1#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=144#comment-207</guid>
		<description>It is so awesome to travel around Hawaii! It makes me feel at ease and relaxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so awesome to travel around Hawaii! It makes me feel at ease and relaxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should You Walk Away From Your Mortgage? by DG</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=162&#038;cpage=1#comment-194</link>
		<dc:creator>DG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=162#comment-194</guid>
		<description>The banks would actually lose a great deal of money in the long run if they did this.   There are plenty of people who will walk away from homes that the bank will make money on in the future.  It goes back to the saying cut off your nose to spite your face.  A lot of people are going through foreclosure and the banks would have an exceptionally difficult time telling who has the means to pay and who is just walking.  All that being said even if the policy was no credit for 30 years I'd still walk away from my house.  With all the cash I am saving while not making payments I could buy a new car if I needed it(I'll have $30-50k in the banks depending on if it really does take 11 months to foreclose).  If the market doesn't recover... and I don't expect it to.. I'll be able to pay cash for a house within 5-6 years anyway..  So who needs the banks?


I do completely agree with post the banks should not have given so much with no penalty for people who don't pay.  They gave me $372k with 0 down and now my house is worth $150k... what do they expect?  Of course if they had asked for a down payment I would have had to wait because I didn't have one.  I'd have actually been able to avoid the bubble.  Prices would never have gotten so inflated if they had made everyone put 20% down.  I guarantee if I had $80k of my own money I would never walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The banks would actually lose a great deal of money in the long run if they did this.   There are plenty of people who will walk away from homes that the bank will make money on in the future.  It goes back to the saying cut off your nose to spite your face.  A lot of people are going through foreclosure and the banks would have an exceptionally difficult time telling who has the means to pay and who is just walking.  All that being said even if the policy was no credit for 30 years I&#8217;d still walk away from my house.  With all the cash I am saving while not making payments I could buy a new car if I needed it(I&#8217;ll have $30-50k in the banks depending on if it really does take 11 months to foreclose).  If the market doesn&#8217;t recover&#8230; and I don&#8217;t expect it to.. I&#8217;ll be able to pay cash for a house within 5-6 years anyway..  So who needs the banks?</p>
<p>I do completely agree with post the banks should not have given so much with no penalty for people who don&#8217;t pay.  They gave me $372k with 0 down and now my house is worth $150k&#8230; what do they expect?  Of course if they had asked for a down payment I would have had to wait because I didn&#8217;t have one.  I&#8217;d have actually been able to avoid the bubble.  Prices would never have gotten so inflated if they had made everyone put 20% down.  I guarantee if I had $80k of my own money I would never walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finally Crossed the $100 Mark In FatCash by The Capitalist Maven &#187; Yet Another Cashback Rebate Site</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>The Capitalist Maven &#187; Yet Another Cashback Rebate Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 18:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=104#comment-185</guid>
		<description>[...] an overview.  I have posted in the past about how cash rebate sites work.  Basically the process is you sign up with the cashback site [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] an overview.  I have posted in the past about how cash rebate sites work.  Basically the process is you sign up with the cashback site [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Visit to Canada by The Capitalist Maven &#187; College Savings a Pipe Dream?</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=127&#038;cpage=1#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>The Capitalist Maven &#187; College Savings a Pipe Dream?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 18:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=127#comment-163</guid>
		<description>[...] the weekend on my bachelor party, one of my friends while lamenting some losses at the blackjack tables, commented about how he is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the weekend on my bachelor party, one of my friends while lamenting some losses at the blackjack tables, commented about how he is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Calling BS on the recession by The Capitalist Maven &#187; Still Think The US Is In A Recession?</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=84&#038;cpage=1#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>The Capitalist Maven &#187; Still Think The US Is In A Recession?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=84#comment-159</guid>
		<description>[...] its GDP estimate for the spring quarter April-June to 3.3% growth!  Regular readers already know I&#8217;ve been a contrarian to &#8220;the US is in a steep recession&#8221; view that has been perpetuated by the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] its GDP estimate for the spring quarter April-June to 3.3% growth!  Regular readers already know I&#8217;ve been a contrarian to &#8220;the US is in a steep recession&#8221; view that has been perpetuated by the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes:  Who To Blame? by akb</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114&#038;cpage=1#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>akb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Jon,

"If banks lend money to people who can’t pay it back, banks will end up taking the loss in foreclosure, the investors in that bank should take the loss. I think the current stock market valuations are capitalisms way of punishing these banks, we don’t need the government to do it."

A whole host of economic leaders, elected and not elected, have decided that we do need the government involved to stop the dominos of our financial system from falling.  The spectrum of people is very wide, including those that would usually be against government intervention in the market.  I remember reading something from a Cato commentator that ceded this (sorry, can't find a citation I think it was WaPo).  This at least suggests that we've had a market failure and that it would be very painful for the market to correct itself on its own.

What I was trying to suggest is that the reason the market is having such difficulty correcting itself is that the financial industry allowed its greed to make them extremely poor stewards of our economy.  Had they not, as you say, some people who made poor decisions would have lost their homes and banks that made poor loans would have gone out of business.  That's not what happened.  Instead, domino after domino falls over because multiple layers of public and private regulation failed.  

Its pretty clear that there's going to be enormous overhaul of at least the public regulatory system.  What the effect on private regulatory mechanisms will be I don't know enough about the industry to say, but I imagine there will be big changes in the place of bond ratings agencies.

I think the Republican stance on regulation is perfectly clear, both in their stated policies and what they've done.  Their general policy is to understaff agencies and make them toothless, we've seen that across the board in EPA, FDA, SEC, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>&#8220;If banks lend money to people who can’t pay it back, banks will end up taking the loss in foreclosure, the investors in that bank should take the loss. I think the current stock market valuations are capitalisms way of punishing these banks, we don’t need the government to do it.&#8221;</p>
<p>A whole host of economic leaders, elected and not elected, have decided that we do need the government involved to stop the dominos of our financial system from falling.  The spectrum of people is very wide, including those that would usually be against government intervention in the market.  I remember reading something from a Cato commentator that ceded this (sorry, can&#8217;t find a citation I think it was WaPo).  This at least suggests that we&#8217;ve had a market failure and that it would be very painful for the market to correct itself on its own.</p>
<p>What I was trying to suggest is that the reason the market is having such difficulty correcting itself is that the financial industry allowed its greed to make them extremely poor stewards of our economy.  Had they not, as you say, some people who made poor decisions would have lost their homes and banks that made poor loans would have gone out of business.  That&#8217;s not what happened.  Instead, domino after domino falls over because multiple layers of public and private regulation failed.  </p>
<p>Its pretty clear that there&#8217;s going to be enormous overhaul of at least the public regulatory system.  What the effect on private regulatory mechanisms will be I don&#8217;t know enough about the industry to say, but I imagine there will be big changes in the place of bond ratings agencies.</p>
<p>I think the Republican stance on regulation is perfectly clear, both in their stated policies and what they&#8217;ve done.  Their general policy is to understaff agencies and make them toothless, we&#8217;ve seen that across the board in EPA, FDA, SEC, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes:  Who To Blame? by LC Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114&#038;cpage=1#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>LC Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 05:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114#comment-157</guid>
		<description>I agree that those that bought a house when they should have continued renting are to blame for the trouble they are in, but the government policies and lack of regulation that encouraged this great ownership society and the great economy that came with it is the real villain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that those that bought a house when they should have continued renting are to blame for the trouble they are in, but the government policies and lack of regulation that encouraged this great ownership society and the great economy that came with it is the real villain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes:  Who To Blame? by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114&#038;cpage=1#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114#comment-156</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure I understand your point akb.  If banks lend money to people who can't pay it back, banks will end up taking the loss in foreclosure, the investors in that bank should take the loss.  I think the current stock market valuations are capitalisms way of punishing these banks, we don't need the government to do it.  

When people buy houses they can't afford and the bank takes them back, it's their own damn fault.  They should not have the government stepping in and guaranteeing their loan just so they can stay in a house they can't afford.  Government should never have been and never should be involved in this.  The people who took the risk will be punished by the free market.  Those who didn't take the risk (like myself) aren't feeling the effects of any economic slowdown.  The non-risk takers will be well positioned to make substantial gains once these issues resolve themselves _on their own_.  

I substantially disagree with your assertion that the republican administration is somehow responsible for the poor rating of mortgage backed securities.  Can you name the specific piece of legislation that allowed this to happen?  The republicans were the only one's willing to stand up to Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and company against bailing out the banking industry and creating this moral hazard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I understand your point akb.  If banks lend money to people who can&#8217;t pay it back, banks will end up taking the loss in foreclosure, the investors in that bank should take the loss.  I think the current stock market valuations are capitalisms way of punishing these banks, we don&#8217;t need the government to do it.  </p>
<p>When people buy houses they can&#8217;t afford and the bank takes them back, it&#8217;s their own damn fault.  They should not have the government stepping in and guaranteeing their loan just so they can stay in a house they can&#8217;t afford.  Government should never have been and never should be involved in this.  The people who took the risk will be punished by the free market.  Those who didn&#8217;t take the risk (like myself) aren&#8217;t feeling the effects of any economic slowdown.  The non-risk takers will be well positioned to make substantial gains once these issues resolve themselves _on their own_.  </p>
<p>I substantially disagree with your assertion that the republican administration is somehow responsible for the poor rating of mortgage backed securities.  Can you name the specific piece of legislation that allowed this to happen?  The republicans were the only one&#8217;s willing to stand up to Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and company against bailing out the banking industry and creating this moral hazard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Economic Woes:  Who To Blame? by akb</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114&#038;cpage=1#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>akb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=114#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Of course this is true.  However, there are definitely things that "the American people" trusted that leaders (elected and unelected) would manage effectively, and their trust was miserably violated.  

In what way do the American people have blame for Moody's and their ilk rating securities backed by "liar loans" AAA?  The heart of the economic woes caused by the subprime fallout are a classic tale of Wall Street greed and arrogance abetted by an incompetent regulatory apparatus.  The American people shouldn't need to instruct these leaders not to build trillions of dollars of our economy on top of fraud.

I agree that the American people should definitely clean house now.  There's no one to blame but the American people if that doesn't happen.  Shareholders should fire vast swaths of executives that presided over this mess.  Voters should hold elected officials accountable.  

The Republican Party in general and the Bush administration in particular have made it a cornerstone of their policies to systematically destroy the ability of government regulators to regulate effectively and to espouse industry "self regulation".  We are seeing the fruit of this very clear now, I hope Republicans get the credit that they deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course this is true.  However, there are definitely things that &#8220;the American people&#8221; trusted that leaders (elected and unelected) would manage effectively, and their trust was miserably violated.  </p>
<p>In what way do the American people have blame for Moody&#8217;s and their ilk rating securities backed by &#8220;liar loans&#8221; AAA?  The heart of the economic woes caused by the subprime fallout are a classic tale of Wall Street greed and arrogance abetted by an incompetent regulatory apparatus.  The American people shouldn&#8217;t need to instruct these leaders not to build trillions of dollars of our economy on top of fraud.</p>
<p>I agree that the American people should definitely clean house now.  There&#8217;s no one to blame but the American people if that doesn&#8217;t happen.  Shareholders should fire vast swaths of executives that presided over this mess.  Voters should hold elected officials accountable.  </p>
<p>The Republican Party in general and the Bush administration in particular have made it a cornerstone of their policies to systematically destroy the ability of government regulators to regulate effectively and to espouse industry &#8220;self regulation&#8221;.  We are seeing the fruit of this very clear now, I hope Republicans get the credit that they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Finally Crossed the $100 Mark In FatCash by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=104&#038;cpage=1#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 16:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.capitalistmaven.com/?p=104#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately Live Search doesn't seem to have travel providers yet.  I agree that cashback should not make the difference when selecting where to buy, but if you are going to buy at a certain merchant anyway, the cashback is a nice gravy on top.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately Live Search doesn&#8217;t seem to have travel providers yet.  I agree that cashback should not make the difference when selecting where to buy, but if you are going to buy at a certain merchant anyway, the cashback is a nice gravy on top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
